Golif 22 vs Marlow-Hunter 22
How do the Golif 22 and Marlow-Hunter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Golif 22 | Golif 22 | Marlow-Hunter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 7.4 ft2.26 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | 1,058,219 lb480,000 kg | 500 lb227 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 215 ft²20.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.40 | 24.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 290 | 115 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Golif 22 vs Marlow-Hunter 22: the short version
- The Golif 22 and Marlow-Hunter 22 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Golif 22 is heavier, displacing about 69% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 22 carries the more powerful rig (24.2 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Golif 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Golif 22 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.