Golif 22 vs Ohlson 22
How do the Golif 22 and Ohlson 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Golif 22 | Golif 22 | Ohlson 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.4 ft2.26 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Ballast | 1,058,219 lb480,000 kg | 1,213 lb550 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.40 | 20.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 290 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 17.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | €1,500 |
Golif 22 vs Ohlson 22: the short version
- The Golif 22 and Ohlson 22 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Ohlson 22 is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 22 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Golif 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Golif 22 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.