Grampian 26 vs Hallberg-Rassy 26
How do the Grampian 26 and Hallberg-Rassy 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Grampian 26 
Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Grampian 26 | Hallberg-Rassy 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 26.1 ft7.95 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 8.8 ft2.68 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 5,512 lb2,500 kg |
| Ballast | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 326 ft²30.3 m² | 398 ft²37.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.84 | 20.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 279 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 21.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | — | €10,000 |
Grampian 26 vs Hallberg-Rassy 26: the short version
- The Grampian 26 and Hallberg-Rassy 26 are close in length (26.0 ft7.92 m vs 26.1 ft7.95 m ).
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hallberg-Rassy 26 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grampian 26 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.