Grampian 26 vs Nash 26
How do the Grampian 26 and Nash 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Grampian 26 
Nash 26 | Grampian 26 | Nash 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 21.3 ft6.48 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 5,200 lb2,359 kg |
| Ballast | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Sail area | 326 ft²30.3 m² | 288 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.84 | 15.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 242 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 20.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.2 |
Grampian 26 vs Nash 26: the short version
- The Grampian 26 and Nash 26 are close in length (26.0 ft7.92 m vs 26.0 ft7.92 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Grampian 26 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nash 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grampian 26 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.