Grampian 28 vs Ranger 28
How do the Grampian 28 and Ranger 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Grampian 28 
Ranger 28 | Grampian 28 | Ranger 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 21.7 ft6.61 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 6,900 lb3,130 kg | 5,081 lb2,305 kg |
| Ballast | 3,060 lb1,388 kg | 2,792 lb1,266 kg |
| Sail area | 384 ft²35.7 m² | 389 ft²36.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.95 | 21.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 209 | 223 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 16.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 2.23 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.2 |
Grampian 28 vs Ranger 28: the short version
- The Grampian 28 and Ranger 28 are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- The Grampian 28 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 28 carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Grampian 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grampian 28 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.