Grampian 30 vs Scampi 30
How do the Grampian 30 and Scampi 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Grampian 30 
Scampi 30 | Grampian 30 | Scampi 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.07 m | 29.8 ft9.07 m |
| Waterline length | 25.5 ft7.77 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 8,600 lb3,901 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 3,870 lb1,755 kg | 2,778 lb1,260 kg |
| Sail area | 389 ft²36.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 14.83 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 232 | 267 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.7 | 21.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | — | €14,000 |
Grampian 30 vs Scampi 30: the short version
- The Grampian 30 and Scampi 30 are close in length (29.8 ft9.07 m vs 29.8 ft9.07 m ).
- The Grampian 30 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Grampian 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grampian 30 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.