Granada 23 vs Kirby 23
How do the Granada 23 and Kirby 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 23 
Kirby 23 | Granada 23 | Kirby 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.02 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 18.8 ft5.73 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 273 ft²25.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.98 | 24.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 161 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.7 | 12.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 2.32 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | €4,000 | — |
Granada 23 vs Kirby 23: the short version
- The Granada 23 and Kirby 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.02 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- The Granada 23 is heavier, displacing about 38% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Kirby 23 carries the more powerful rig (24.4 vs 21.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Granada 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Granada 23 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.32).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.