Granada 23 vs Marlin 23
How do the Granada 23 and Marlin 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 23 | Granada 23 | Marlin 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.02 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 16.9 ft5.16 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,400 lb635 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 259 ft²24.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.98 | 19.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 276 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.7 | 17.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.5 |
| Average used price | €4,000 | — |
Granada 23 vs Marlin 23: the short version
- The Granada 23 and Marlin 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.02 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- The Granada 23 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 23 carries the more powerful rig (21.0 vs 19.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marlin 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marlin 23 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.