Granada 23 vs Paceship 23
How do the Granada 23 and Paceship 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 23 
Paceship 23 | Granada 23 | Paceship 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.02 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 225 ft²20.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.98 | 20.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 150 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.7 | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 2.42 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | €4,000 | — |
Granada 23 vs Paceship 23: the short version
- The Granada 23 and Paceship 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.02 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- The Granada 23 is heavier, displacing about 44% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 23 carries the more powerful rig (21.0 vs 20.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Granada 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Granada 23 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.