Granada 27 vs Hullmaster 27
How do the Granada 27 and Hullmaster 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 27 
Hullmaster 27 | Granada 27 | Hullmaster 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.28 m | 27.3 ft8.31 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.78 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 398 ft²37.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 16.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 332 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.3 | 25.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €11,000 | — |
Granada 27 vs Hullmaster 27: the short version
- The Granada 27 and Hullmaster 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.28 m vs 27.3 ft8.31 m ).
- The Hullmaster 27 is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hullmaster 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hullmaster 27 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.