Granada 27 vs Maxi Fenix
How do the Granada 27 and Maxi Fenix compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 27 | Granada 27 | Maxi Fenix | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.28 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 24.3 ft7.40 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.78 m | 9.3 ft2.85 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 2,150 lb975 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 21.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.3 | 19.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €11,000 | €9,500 |
Granada 27 vs Maxi Fenix: the short version
- The Granada 27 and Maxi Fenix are close in length (27.2 ft8.28 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Maxi Fenix is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Fenix scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Fenix rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.