Granada 27 vs Mirage 27
How do the Granada 27 and Mirage 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 27 %20sailboat%20Bothan%204073.jpg?width=960)
Mirage 27 | Granada 27 | Mirage 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.28 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.78 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 19.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 247 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.3 | 18.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €11,000 | — |
Granada 27 vs Mirage 27: the short version
- The Granada 27 and Mirage 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.28 m vs 27.2 ft8.28 m ).
- The Mirage 27 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 19.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 27 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.