Granada 27 vs Wasa 270
How do the Granada 27 and Wasa 270 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 27 | Granada 27 | Wasa 270 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.28 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.78 m | 8.4 ft2.56 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 360 ft²33.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 20.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.3 | 17.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €11,000 | €18,500 |
Granada 27 vs Wasa 270: the short version
- The Granada 27 and Wasa 270 are close in length (27.2 ft8.28 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Wasa 270 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Wasa 270 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.