Grand Raid 368 vs Hobie Bravo
How do the Grand Raid 368 and Hobie Bravo compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Grand Raid 368 
Hobie Bravo | Grand Raid 368 | Hobie Bravo | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Draft | —— | 0.5 ft0.15 m |
| Displacement | 46 lb21 kg | 195 lb88 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 87 ft²8.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 41.40 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.49 | 3.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Grand Raid 368 vs Hobie Bravo: the short version
- The Grand Raid 368 and Hobie Bravo are close in length (12.1 ft3.68 m vs 12.0 ft3.66 m ).
- The Hobie Bravo is heavier, displacing about 324% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grand Raid 368 rates better for offshore work (2.49 vs 3.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.