Grand Raid 368 vs Kanga 366
How do the Grand Raid 368 and Kanga 366 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Grand Raid 368 | Grand Raid 368 | Kanga 366 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 46 lb21 kg | 33 lb15 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.49 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Grand Raid 368 vs Kanga 366: the short version
- The Grand Raid 368 and Kanga 366 are close in length (12.1 ft3.68 m vs 12.0 ft3.66 m ).
- The Grand Raid 368 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grand Raid 368 rates better for offshore work (2.49 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.