Gulfstar 43 vs Hunter 410
How do the Gulfstar 43 and Hunter 410 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Gulfstar 43 
Hunter 410 | Gulfstar 43 | Hunter 410 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.3 ft13.21 m | 43.4 ft13.23 m |
| Waterline length | 39.2 ft11.94 m | 37.8 ft11.53 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 21,000 lb9,525 kg | 20,200 lb9,163 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Sail area | 664 ft²61.7 m² | 822 ft²76.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.96 | 17.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 167 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.6 | 23.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.2 |
Gulfstar 43 vs Hunter 410: the short version
- The Gulfstar 43 and Hunter 410 are close in length (43.3 ft13.21 m vs 43.4 ft13.23 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 410 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Gulfstar 43 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Gulfstar 43 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.