Hallberg-Rassy 26 vs Maxi Magic
How do the Hallberg-Rassy 26 and Maxi Magic compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Maxi Magic | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.95 m | 26.1 ft7.97 m |
| Waterline length | 20.7 ft6.30 m | 22.6 ft6.90 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.68 m | 9.1 ft2.76 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 2,425 lb1,100 kg | 1,543 lb700 kg |
| Sail area | 398 ft²37.0 m² | 404 ft²37.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.41 | 22.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 187 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 16.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.14 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €10,000 | €9,000 |
Hallberg-Rassy 26 vs Maxi Magic: the short version
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 and Maxi Magic are close in length (26.1 ft7.95 m vs 26.1 ft7.97 m ).
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Magic carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hallberg-Rassy 26 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.