Hallberg-Rassy 26 vs Maxi Racer
How do the Hallberg-Rassy 26 and Maxi Racer compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Maxi Racer | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.95 m | 26.1 ft7.97 m |
| Waterline length | 20.7 ft6.30 m | 23.3 ft7.10 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.68 m | 9.1 ft2.76 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,425 lb1,100 kg | 1,653 lb750 kg |
| Sail area | 398 ft²37.0 m² | 409 ft²38.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.41 | 26.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 140 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 13.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.29 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €10,000 | €4,500 |
Hallberg-Rassy 26 vs Maxi Racer: the short version
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 and Maxi Racer are close in length (26.1 ft7.95 m vs 26.1 ft7.97 m ).
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Racer carries the more powerful rig (26.1 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hallberg-Rassy 26 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.29).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.