Halman 20 vs Havsfidra
How do the Halman 20 and Havsfidra compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Halman 20 
Havsfidra | Halman 20 | Havsfidra | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.86 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Sail area | 179 ft²16.6 m² | 183 ft²17.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.55 | 13.19 |
| Displacement / Length | 224 | 335 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.1 | 21.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.4 |
| Average used price | — | €1,500 |
Halman 20 vs Havsfidra: the short version
- The Halman 20 and Havsfidra are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Havsfidra is heavier, displacing about 32% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Halman 20 carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Havsfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Havsfidra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.