Halman 20 vs Hunter 20
How do the Halman 20 and Hunter 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Halman 20 
Hunter 20 | Halman 20 | Hunter 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.86 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 179 ft²16.6 m² | 169 ft²15.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.55 | 18.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 224 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.1 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.3 |
Halman 20 vs Hunter 20: the short version
- The Halman 20 and Hunter 20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Halman 20 is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Halman 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Halman 20 rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.