Halman 20 vs Marieholm S20
How do the Halman 20 and Marieholm S20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Halman 20 
Marieholm S20 | Halman 20 | Marieholm S20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 17.2 ft5.25 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.86 m | 3.0 ft0.90 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 2,756 lb1,250 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 882 lb400 kg |
| Sail area | 179 ft²16.6 m² | 180 ft²16.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.55 | 14.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 224 | 241 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.1 | 17.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.6 |
| Average used price | — | €1,100 |
Halman 20 vs Marieholm S20: the short version
- The Halman 20 and Marieholm S20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Marieholm S20 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Halman 20 carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm S20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm S20 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.