Halman 20 vs Sunwind 20
How do the Halman 20 and Sunwind 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Halman 20 
Sunwind 20 | Halman 20 | Sunwind 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.21 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.86 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 179 ft²16.6 m² | 226 ft²21.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.55 | 15.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 224 | 357 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.1 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.4 |
| Average used price | — | €900 |
Halman 20 vs Sunwind 20: the short version
- The Halman 20 and Sunwind 20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Sunwind 20 is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sunwind 20 carries the more powerful rig (15.6 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sunwind 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sunwind 20 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.