Halman Horizon vs Hotfoot 27
How do the Halman Horizon and Hotfoot 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Halman Horizon 
Hotfoot 27 | Halman Horizon | Hotfoot 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 3,600 lb1,633 kg |
| Ballast | 2,250 lb1,021 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 347 ft²32.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 23.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 257 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.8 | 12.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Halman Horizon vs Hotfoot 27: the short version
- The Halman Horizon and Hotfoot 27 are close in length (27.0 ft8.23 m vs 27.0 ft8.23 m ).
- The Halman Horizon is heavier, displacing about 94% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Halman Horizon scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Halman Horizon rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.