Hans Christian 33 vs San Juan 34
How do the Hans Christian 33 and San Juan 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hans Christian 33 | Hans Christian 33 | San Juan 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.8 ft10.29 m | 33.8 ft10.30 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 27.9 ft8.51 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 6,300 lb2,858 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Sail area | 600 ft²55.7 m² | 551 ft²51.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.48 | 18.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 342 | 215 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.5 | 22.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.75 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.1 |
Hans Christian 33 vs San Juan 34: the short version
- The Hans Christian 33 and San Juan 34 are close in length (33.8 ft10.29 m vs 33.8 ft10.30 m ).
- The Hans Christian 33 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the San Juan 34 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hans Christian 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hans Christian 33 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.