Hans Christian 33 vs Tartan 33
How do the Hans Christian 33 and Tartan 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hans Christian 33 | Hans Christian 33 | Tartan 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.8 ft10.29 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 11.0 ft3.34 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.6 ft1.39 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Ballast | 6,300 lb2,858 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 600 ft²55.7 m² | 531 ft²49.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.48 | 18.30 |
| Displacement / Length | 342 | 186 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.5 | 21.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.75 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Hans Christian 33 vs Tartan 33: the short version
- The Hans Christian 33 and Tartan 33 are close in length (33.8 ft10.29 m vs 33.7 ft10.26 m ).
- The Hans Christian 33 is heavier, displacing about 90% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tartan 33 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hans Christian 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hans Christian 33 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.