Hartley TS16/18/21 vs J11
How do the Hartley TS16/18/21 and J11 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hartley TS16/18/21 | Hartley TS16/18/21 | J11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 13.4 ft4.10 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.24 m | 2.4 ft0.74 m |
| Displacement | 794 lb360 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 661 lb300 kg |
| Sail area | 149 ft²13.8 m² | 135 ft²12.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.80 | 17.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 129 | 243 |
| Comfort ratio | 6.0 | 11.6 |
| Capsize screening | 3.12 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 4.9 |
| Average used price | — | €1,000 |
Hartley TS16/18/21 vs J11: the short version
- The Hartley TS16/18/21 and J11 are close in length (16.4 ft5.00 m vs 16.4 ft5.00 m ).
- The J11 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hartley TS16/18/21 carries the more powerful rig (27.8 vs 17.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The J11 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the J11 rates better for offshore work (2.39 vs 3.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.