Havsfidra vs Hunter 20
How do the Havsfidra and Hunter 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Havsfidra | Havsfidra | Hunter 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.20 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 169 ft²15.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.19 | 18.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 2.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Havsfidra vs Hunter 20: the short version
- The Havsfidra and Hunter 20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Havsfidra is heavier, displacing about 95% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Havsfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Havsfidra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.