Havsfidra vs Kelt 550
How do the Havsfidra and Kelt 550 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Havsfidra 
Kelt 550 | Havsfidra | Kelt 550 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 17.2 ft5.25 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.20 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 1,190 lb540 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 13.19 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 104 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 6.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 3.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.6 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Havsfidra vs Kelt 550: the short version
- The Havsfidra and Kelt 550 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.6 ft5.97 m ).
- The Havsfidra is heavier, displacing about 178% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Havsfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Havsfidra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.