Herreshoff Bull's Eye vs Phantom 16
How do the Herreshoff Bull's Eye and Phantom 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Herreshoff Bull's Eye Herreshoff Manufacturing Company · 1914 Phantom 16 Centro Nautico Adriatico · 1988 | Herreshoff Bull's Eye | Phantom 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.7 ft4.79 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Waterline length | 12.5 ft3.82 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 1,350 lb612 kg | 265 lb120 kg |
| Ballast | 750 lb340 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.30 | 116.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 307 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 4.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | — |
Herreshoff Bull's Eye vs Phantom 16: the short version
- The Herreshoff Bull's Eye and Phantom 16 are close in length (15.7 ft4.79 m vs 15.9 ft4.85 m ).
- The Herreshoff Bull's Eye is heavier, displacing about 409% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom 16 carries the more powerful rig (116.7 vs 20.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Herreshoff Bull's Eye rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 4.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.