Herreshoff H-26 vs Paceship PY 26
How do the Herreshoff H-26 and Paceship PY 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Herreshoff H-26 
Paceship PY 26 | Herreshoff H-26 | Paceship PY 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.02 m | 26.3 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 360 ft²33.4 m² | 339 ft²31.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.54 | 16.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 235 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.9 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.4 |
Herreshoff H-26 vs Paceship PY 26: the short version
- The Herreshoff H-26 and Paceship PY 26 are close in length (26.3 ft8.02 m vs 26.3 ft8.03 m ).
- The Herreshoff H-26 is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Herreshoff H-26 carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Herreshoff H-26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Herreshoff H-26 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.