Hinterhoeller F3 vs Invader 36
How do the Hinterhoeller F3 and Invader 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hinterhoeller F3 | Hinterhoeller F3 | Invader 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.08 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 10,550 lb4,785 kg |
| Ballast | 5,730 lb2,599 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Sail area | 630 ft²58.5 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.50 | 16.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 330 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 30.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.13 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 6.6 |
Hinterhoeller F3 vs Invader 36: the short version
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.08 m LOA versus 35.8 ft10.90 m for the Invader 36.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Invader 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Invader 36 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.