Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 22
How do the Hinterhoeller F3 and Nonsuch 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hinterhoeller F3 
Nonsuch 22 | Hinterhoeller F3 | Nonsuch 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.08 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 5,730 lb2,599 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Sail area | 630 ft²58.5 m² | 306 ft²28.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.50 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 21.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.13 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 6.1 |
Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 22: the short version
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.08 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Nonsuch 22.
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is heavier, displacing about 118% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 22 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.