Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 26
How do the Hinterhoeller F3 and Nonsuch 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hinterhoeller F3 
Nonsuch 26 | Hinterhoeller F3 | Nonsuch 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.08 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 24.4 ft7.44 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 5,730 lb2,599 kg | 2,750 lb1,247 kg |
| Sail area | 630 ft²58.5 m² | 420 ft²39.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.50 | 16.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 261 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 23.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.13 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 6.6 |
Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 26: the short version
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.08 m LOA versus 26.0 ft7.92 m for the Nonsuch 26.
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 26 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.