Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 33
How do the Hinterhoeller F3 and Nonsuch 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hinterhoeller F3 | Hinterhoeller F3 | Nonsuch 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.08 m | 33.4 ft10.19 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 31.5 ft9.59 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 15,350 lb6,963 kg |
| Ballast | 5,730 lb2,599 kg | 6,050 lb2,744 kg |
| Sail area | 630 ft²58.5 m² | 669 ft²62.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.50 | 17.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 220 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.13 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 33: the short version
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.08 m LOA versus 33.4 ft10.19 m for the Nonsuch 33.
- The Nonsuch 33 is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 33 rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.