Hobie 33 vs Newport 33
How do the Hobie 33 and Newport 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hobie 33 | Hobie 33 | Newport 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.30 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 429 ft²39.9 m² | 465 ft²43.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.24 | 16.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 63 | 215 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 21.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.0 |
Hobie 33 vs Newport 33: the short version
- The Hobie 33 and Newport 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.06 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Newport 33 is heavier, displacing about 138% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hobie 33 carries the more powerful rig (27.2 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Newport 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hobie 33 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.