Hobie Bravo vs Kanga 366
How do the Hobie Bravo and Kanga 366 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hobie Bravo 
Kanga 366 | Hobie Bravo | Kanga 366 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | 0.5 ft0.15 m | —— |
| Displacement | 195 lb88 kg | 33 lb15 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 87 ft²8.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 41.40 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.05 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Hobie Bravo vs Kanga 366: the short version
- The Hobie Bravo and Kanga 366 are close in length (12.0 ft3.66 m vs 12.0 ft3.66 m ).
- The Hobie Bravo is heavier, displacing about 491% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Kanga 366 rates better for offshore work (2.66 vs 3.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.