Hobie Bravo vs Tech Dinghy
How do the Hobie Bravo and Tech Dinghy compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hobie Bravo 
Tech Dinghy | Hobie Bravo | Tech Dinghy | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Draft | 0.5 ft0.15 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 195 lb88 kg | 250 lb113 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 87 ft²8.1 m² | 72 ft²6.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 41.40 | 29.03 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.05 | 2.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Hobie Bravo vs Tech Dinghy: the short version
- The Hobie Bravo and Tech Dinghy are close in length (12.0 ft3.66 m vs 12.0 ft3.66 m ).
- The Tech Dinghy is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hobie Bravo carries the more powerful rig (41.4 vs 29.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tech Dinghy rates better for offshore work (2.97 vs 3.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.