Hobie Getaway vs Ranger 16
How do the Hobie Getaway and Ranger 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hobie Getaway 
Ranger 16 | Hobie Getaway | Ranger 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.6 ft5.05 m | 16.7 ft5.08 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 7.7 ft2.34 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 0.7 ft0.21 m | 3.0 ft0.90 m |
| Displacement | 390 lb177 kg | 450 lb204 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 154 ft²14.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 53.95 | 41.96 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.20 | 3.13 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Hobie Getaway vs Ranger 16: the short version
- The Hobie Getaway and Ranger 16 are close in length (16.6 ft5.05 m vs 16.7 ft5.08 m ).
- The Ranger 16 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hobie Getaway carries the more powerful rig (54.0 vs 42.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 16 rates better for offshore work (3.13 vs 4.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.