Holder 17 vs Nacra 5.2
How do the Holder 17 and Nacra 5.2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Holder 17 | Holder 17 | Nacra 5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 17.0 ft5.18 m |
| Waterline length | 15.0 ft4.57 m | —— |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.27 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 950 lb431 kg | 350 lb159 kg |
| Ballast | 325 lb147 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 140 ft²13.0 m² | 220 ft²20.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.18 | 70.88 |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 7.0 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.85 | 4.54 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.2 | — |
Holder 17 vs Nacra 5.2: the short version
- The Holder 17 and Nacra 5.2 are close in length (17.0 ft5.18 m vs 17.0 ft5.18 m ).
- The Holder 17 is heavier, displacing about 171% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nacra 5.2 carries the more powerful rig (70.9 vs 23.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Holder 17 rates better for offshore work (2.85 vs 4.54).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.