Holder 17 vs Vagabond 17
How do the Holder 17 and Vagabond 17 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Holder 17 | Holder 17 | Vagabond 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 17.0 ft5.18 m |
| Waterline length | 15.0 ft4.57 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.27 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 950 lb431 kg | 950 lb431 kg |
| Ballast | 325 lb147 kg | 345 lb156 kg |
| Sail area | 140 ft²13.0 m² | 140 ft²13.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.18 | 23.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | 126 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.0 | 6.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.85 | 2.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Holder 17 vs Vagabond 17: the short version
- The Holder 17 and Vagabond 17 are close in length (17.0 ft5.18 m vs 17.0 ft5.18 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Vagabond 17 carries the more powerful rig (23.2 vs 23.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Holder 17 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Holder 17 rates better for offshore work (2.85 vs 2.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.