Hotfoot 27 vs Santana 27
How do the Hotfoot 27 and Santana 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hotfoot 27 | Hotfoot 27 | Santana 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 27.0 ft8.24 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 1,500 lb680 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 347 ft²32.2 m² | 348 ft²32.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.64 | 19.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 151 | 196 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 17.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.44 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.4 |
Hotfoot 27 vs Santana 27: the short version
- The Hotfoot 27 and Santana 27 are close in length (27.0 ft8.23 m vs 27.0 ft8.24 m ).
- The Santana 27 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hotfoot 27 carries the more powerful rig (23.6 vs 19.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 27 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.