Hughes 36 vs Stratus 36
How do the Hughes 36 and Stratus 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hughes 36 | Hughes 36 | Stratus 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.3 ft10.74 m | 35.2 ft10.72 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Beam | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 13,000 lb5,897 kg | 11,466 lb5,201 kg |
| Ballast | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 4,960 lb2,250 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 506 ft²47.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.47 | 15.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 253 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 25.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Hughes 36 vs Stratus 36: the short version
- The Hughes 36 and Stratus 36 are close in length (35.3 ft10.74 m vs 35.2 ft10.72 m ).
- The Hughes 36 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stratus 36 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 14.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hughes 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hughes 36 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.