Hughes-Columbia 36 vs Invader 36
How do the Hughes-Columbia 36 and Invader 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hughes-Columbia 36 | Hughes-Columbia 36 | Invader 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.92 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 10,550 lb4,785 kg |
| Ballast | 6,300 lb2,858 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Sail area | 525 ft²48.8 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.81 | 16.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 305 | 330 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 30.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.65 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.6 |
Hughes-Columbia 36 vs Invader 36: the short version
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 and Invader 36 are close in length (35.8 ft10.92 m vs 35.8 ft10.90 m ).
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 is heavier, displacing about 42% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Invader 36 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 13.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hughes-Columbia 36 rates better for offshore work (1.65 vs 1.67).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.