Hughes-Columbia 36 vs Pilot 35
How do the Hughes-Columbia 36 and Pilot 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hughes-Columbia 36 | Hughes-Columbia 36 | Pilot 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.92 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 13,700 lb6,214 kg |
| Ballast | 6,300 lb2,858 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 525 ft²48.8 m² | 550 ft²51.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.81 | 15.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 305 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 37.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.65 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.7 |
Hughes-Columbia 36 vs Pilot 35: the short version
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 and Pilot 35 are close in length (35.8 ft10.92 m vs 35.8 ft10.90 m ).
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Pilot 35 carries the more powerful rig (15.4 vs 13.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pilot 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pilot 35 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.