Hullmaster 27 vs Wasa 270
How do the Hullmaster 27 and Wasa 270 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hullmaster 27 
Wasa 270 | Hullmaster 27 | Wasa 270 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 8.4 ft2.56 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 398 ft²37.0 m² | 360 ft²33.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.77 | 20.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.4 | 17.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | — | €18,500 |
Hullmaster 27 vs Wasa 270: the short version
- The Hullmaster 27 and Wasa 270 are close in length (27.3 ft8.31 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Hullmaster 27 is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Wasa 270 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hullmaster 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hullmaster 27 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.