Hunter 140 vs Hunter 19-2
How do the Hunter 140 and Hunter 19-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 140 | Hunter 140 | Hunter 19-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 225 lb102 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 102 ft²9.5 m² | 167 ft²15.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.12 | 16.83 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 221 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 12.0 |
| Capsize screening | 3.83 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.3 |
Hunter 140 vs Hunter 19-2: the short version
- The Hunter 19-2 is the larger boat at 19.0 ft5.79 m LOA versus 14.0 ft4.27 m for the Hunter 140.
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 789% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 140 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-2 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.