Hunter 140 vs Hunter 23
How do the Hunter 140 and Hunter 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 140 
Hunter 23 | Hunter 140 | Hunter 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 23.3 ft7.09 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 2.3 ft0.69 m |
| Displacement | 225 lb102 kg | 2,450 lb1,111 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 800 lb363 kg |
| Sail area | 102 ft²9.5 m² | 236 ft²21.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.12 | 20.78 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 146 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.83 | 2.37 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.9 |
Hunter 140 vs Hunter 23: the short version
- The Hunter 23 is the larger boat at 23.3 ft7.09 m LOA versus 14.0 ft4.27 m for the Hunter 140.
- The Hunter 23 is heavier, displacing about 989% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 140 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 23 rates better for offshore work (2.37 vs 3.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.