Hunter 140 vs Hunter 36 Legend
How do the Hunter 140 and Hunter 36 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 140 
Hunter 36 Legend | Hunter 140 | Hunter 36 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 31.5 ft9.61 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 6.8 ft2.08 m |
| Displacement | 225 lb102 kg | 14,330 lb6,500 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,132 lb2,328 kg |
| Sail area | 102 ft²9.5 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.12 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 3.83 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.5 |
Hunter 140 vs Hunter 36 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 36 Legend is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 14.0 ft4.27 m for the Hunter 140.
- The Hunter 36 Legend is heavier, displacing about 6269% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 140 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 36 Legend rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 3.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.