Hunter 140 vs Hunter 43 Legend
How do the Hunter 140 and Hunter 43 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 140 | Hunter 140 | Hunter 43 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 42.5 ft12.95 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 38.0 ft11.58 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 225 lb102 kg | 23,800 lb10,795 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 7,600 lb3,447 kg |
| Sail area | 102 ft²9.5 m² | 845 ft²78.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.12 | 16.34 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 194 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 27.8 |
| Capsize screening | 3.83 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 8.3 |
Hunter 140 vs Hunter 43 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 43 Legend is the larger boat at 42.5 ft12.95 m LOA versus 14.0 ft4.27 m for the Hunter 140.
- The Hunter 43 Legend is heavier, displacing about 10478% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 140 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 43 Legend rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 3.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.