Hunter 140 vs Jet 14
How do the Hunter 140 and Jet 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 140 | Hunter 140 | Jet 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 13.9 ft4.24 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 225 lb102 kg | 285 lb129 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 102 ft²9.5 m² | 113 ft²10.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.12 | 41.75 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 47 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 4.0 |
| Capsize screening | 3.83 | 2.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.0 |
Hunter 140 vs Jet 14: the short version
- The Hunter 140 and Jet 14 are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.0 ft4.27 m ).
- The Jet 14 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 140 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 41.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Jet 14 rates better for offshore work (2.84 vs 3.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.